Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;333 (26 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.333.7565.0-f
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
This week's bmjupdates+immediately on the left if you're reading the print journallooks at the causes of temperatures exceeding 41°C in children presenting to US emergency departments. Fewer than half had any sort of infection; viral infections were as common as bacterial infections; and neither white cell count nor absolute neutrophil count helped to distinguish between viral and bacterial infections.
Once the diagnoses had been madeurinary tract infections caused by Escherichia coli, lobar pneumonias by Streptococcus pneumoniaethe treatment was presumably straightforward. En route to treatment, however, the contribution of the signs (high temperature) and tests (white cell count) to the final diagnosis was anything but straightforward.
The message I take from this is that while evidence based treatment is well on the way to being sorted out, evidence based diagnosis is still in the dark ages. This week's journal suggests that things are beginning to change. In her editorial
Tony Delamothe, deputy editor
(tdelamothe@bmj.com)
Read all Rapid Responses