BMJ  2006;333:397 (19 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.333.7564.397-a

Letter

Interpretation of screening test results

Scenario does not reflect day to day practice

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

EDITOR—Bramwell et al's article on the interpretation of screening results for Down's syndrome highlights the difficulties that even professionals can experience in interpreting data from screening programmes.1 However, the scenario presenting such difficulty is not the one faced by professionals and patients on a daily basis when informing patients of their screening results for Down's syndrome. Rather, it is how likely a positive test from a screened population is in predicting a Down's syndrome pregnancy.

For women who are screened for Down's syndrome, their unique result will be presented either as, for example, "one in 100" or "1%," a much simpler scenario to convey even by statistically challenged obstetricians. However, there is ample published evidence that all women are made anxious by their positive screening test,2 no matter how they are told, and women's experiences show that medical staff are unclear about the implications of screening tests and . . . [Full text of this article]

Mike Divers, consultant obstetrician

Nobles Hospital, Braddan, Isle of Man IM4 4RJ mike.divers@gov.im


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Health professionals' and service users' interpretation of screening test results: experimental study
Ros Bramwell, Helen West, and Peter Salmon
BMJ 2006 333: 284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

In UK midwives request most tests
john sharvill
bmj.com, 21 Aug 2006 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ