Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;333:397 (19 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.333.7564.397-a
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORBramwell et al's article on the interpretation of screening results for Down's syndrome highlights the difficulties that even professionals can experience in interpreting data from screening programmes.1 However, the scenario presenting such difficulty is not the one faced by professionals and patients on a daily basis when informing patients of their screening results for Down's syndrome. Rather, it is how likely a positive test from a screened population is in predicting a Down's syndrome pregnancy.
For women who are screened for Down's syndrome, their unique result will be presented either as, for example, "one in 100" or "1%," a much simpler scenario to convey even by statistically challenged obstetricians. However, there is ample published evidence that all women are made anxious by their positive screening test,2 no matter how they are told, and women's experiences show that medical staff are unclear about the implications of screening tests and
Mike Divers, consultant obstetrician
Nobles Hospital, Braddan, Isle of Man IM4 4RJ mike.divers@gov.im
Read all Rapid Responses