Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;333:395-396 (19 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.333.7564.395-b
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORArroll and Kenealy conclude that antibiotics are probably effective for acute purulent rhinitis but suggest that most patients will get better without them and hence advocate a "no antibiotics as first line" treatment plan.1 Their systematic review looked at seven studies comparing placebo with antibiotic treatment for "acute purulent rhinitis" and defined acute as "less than 10 days with this symptom." They considered all papers in the Cochrane reviews addressing the use of antibiotics for "the common cold and acute purulent rhinitis and for acute maxillary sinusitis."
They do not mention the evidence base used for the above definitions. The currently accepted definition of acute rhinosinusitis classifies an acute episode as lasting for "up to four weeks with total resolution of symptoms."2 The authors have also grouped three different conditions together under the general heading of acute purulent rhinitis namely, the common cold, acute purulent rhinitis, and acute
Joanne Rimmer, specialist registrar in otolaryngology
West Middlesex University Hospital, Isleworth, Middlesex TW7 6AF jrimmer@doctors.org.uk
John Almeyda, consultant otolaryngologist
West Middlesex University Hospital, Isleworth, Middlesex TW7 6AF