BMJ  2006;333:370 (19 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.333.7564.370-c

News extra

JAMA’s editor stresses authors’ need to disclose financial ties

New York Janice Tanne

The editor of JAMA, the Journal of the American Medical Association, has said that the journal would continue its efforts, begun in 1985, to make readers aware of the financial ties of authors.

In an editorial published online ahead of print on 8 August, JAMA's editor, Catherine DeAngelis, states, “Peer-reviewed medical journals must always place the interests of patients above all else” (www.jama-assn.org, doi:10.1001/jama.296.8.jed60051).

“I think it’s very important now. At least in the United States, the vast majority of clinical research is paid for by drug companies. There’s nothing wrong with that. Somebody’s got to pay for research,” Dr DeAngelis told the BMJ. But when authors fail to disclose ties with drug companies, readers may perceive that authors have something to hide, she added. “In my editorial I went way out of my way to say that even in . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




Student BMJ

Intimate examinations

Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.

www.student.bmj.com

Listen to the latest BMJ Interview