Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;333:353-354 (12 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.333.7563.353-b
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORAs Parry et al point out,1 2 appropriate laboratory methods are crucial in detecting clinically important quinolone resistance.
We highlight the emergence of strains of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi (S Typhi) that show reduced susceptibility to the fluoroquinolones but are susceptible to nalidixic acid (minimum inhibitory concentration < 16 mg/l). In a review of all 692 isolates of S Typhi sent to the Laboratory for Enteric Pathogens at the Health Protection Agency in London between 2000 and 2003 we detected 49 isolates that were susceptible to nalidixic acid but had reduced susceptibility to fluoroquinolone (minimum inhibitory concentration 0.125-1.0 mg/l; table).3 When the country of acquisition was known, 18 of these isolates were from patients who had visited India; eight, Pakistan; four, Bangladesh; and one, Kenya.
|
Overall, of 271 isolates
Fiona J Cooke, MRC clinical research training fellow
fiona@sanger.ac.uk, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Cambridge CB10 1SA
John Wain, member of faculty
Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Cambridge CB10 1SA
E John Threlfall, professor
Health Protection Agency, Centre for Infections, London NW9 5HT