BMJ  2006;333:315-316 (12 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.333.7563.315

Editorial

Governance of research that uses identifiable personal data

Will improve if the public and researchers collaborate to raise standards

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Information contained in routine medical records, disease registries, completed trials, and research programmes is an invaluable resource for research into public health. The secondary use of such data, which were often collected for unrelated purposes, has demonstrated the late effects of treatment, indicated social differences in health care, suggested environmental causes of cancer, and identified epidemics. For years the United Kingdom has been in the forefront of this research, and the NHS has been a unique source of such data.

In most medical research, doctors and investigators have direct contact with patients and can seek spoken and written consent directly. But research reusing previously collected data may encounter considerable difficulties with respect to both consent and anonymity. The study populations may comprise many thousands of people; some patients will have moved or died; the information may need to be linked to two or more databases; and individual identification may . . . [Full text of this article]

University College London, London WC1E 6BE
(robert.souhami@btinternet.com)

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Balancing potential risks and benefits of using confidential data

Christina Davies and Rory Collins
BMJ 2006 333: 349-351. [Full Text] [PDF]

Overcoming barriers to recruitment in health research

Jenny Hewison and Andy Haines
BMJ 2006 333: 300-302. [Full Text] [PDF]

Consent for the use of personal medical data in research

Peter Singleton and Michael Wadsworth
BMJ 2006 333: 255-258. [Full Text] [PDF]

Confidentiality of personal health information used for research

Dipak Kalra, Renate Gertz, Peter Singleton, and Hazel M Inskip
BMJ 2006 333: 196-198. [Full Text] [PDF]

National survey of British public's views on use of identifiable medical data by the National Cancer Registry

Geraldine Barrett, Jackie A Cassell, Janet L Peacock, and Michel P Coleman
BMJ 2006 332: 1068-1072. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Edwards, S J L, Omar, R (2008). Ethics review of research: in pursuit of proportionality. J. Med. Ethics 34: 568-572 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Willison, D J, Emerson, C, Szala-Meneok, K V, Gibson, E, Schwartz, L, Weisbaum, K M, Fournier, F, Brazil, K, Coughlin, M D (2008). Access to medical records for research purposes: varying perceptions across research ethics boards. J. Med. Ethics 34: 308-314 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Kendrick, D., Lyons, R., Christie, N., Towner, E., Benger, J., Groom, L., Coffey, F., Miller, P., Murphy, R., for The UK Burden of Injury Study Group, (2007). Recruiting participants for injury studies in emergency departments. Inj. Prev. 13: 75-77 [Full text]  
• Chantler, C., Clarke, T., Granger, R. (2006). Information technology in the English National Health Service.. JAMA 296: 2255-2258 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

PIAG's role in promoting good research

Joan M Higgins
bmj.com, 14 Aug 2006 [Full text]

Response to 'Governance of research that uses identifiable personal data'

Michael Keegan
bmj.com, 26 Aug 2006 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more here>> and here>>