Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;333:312-313 (12 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.333.7563.312
Is politically contentious, but can it be measured accurately?
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The next British general election will probably be fought over the productivity of public services. Opposition parties have already claimed that the unprecedented extra investment in the NHS has been misspent, with medical staff receiving large increases in pay for doing the same, or even less, work. Although an election may be four years away, the government is seeking evidence to show that, contrary to such claims, the extra resources together with organisational reform have increased productivity in the NHS.
This quest is also being driven by an international requirement for governments to measure output from the public sector and by the Department of Health's need to justify its demands to the Treasury for further increases in resources.1 In the political battle that has already started, both government and opposition parties will make claims and counterclaims as to how the productivity of the NHS in the United Kingdom has
Nick Black, professor of health services research
Health Services Research Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT
(nick.black@lshtm.ac.uk)
John Browne, senior lecturer in outcomes measurement, John Cairns, professor of health economics
Health Services Research Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT
Read all Rapid Responses