Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;333:272-273 (5 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.38929.578414.80
The UK's confusing and inadequate ABC system is ready for an urgent overhaul
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
This week the House of Commons Select Committee on Science and Technology published the report of its inquiry on the classification of illegal drugs in the United Kingdom.1 The report high-lighted glaring anomalies in the classification of illegal drugs into classes A, B, and C and reflected a broad agreement that the current system is not fit for purpose. The committee also reported considerable confusion over the remit of the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs and serious flaws in the way that the council conducts its business.
The select committee's report criticises the government for failing to meet its commitments to evidence based policy making. Indeed, the inquiry on illegal drugs was part of a wider investigation into how the UK government handles scientific advice, risk, and evidence. Launching the whole inquiry last November, the committee chairman, Phil Willis MP, said "We keep hearing from government ministers
Michael Gossop, head of research
National Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, London SE5 8AF
(m.gossop@iop.kcl.ac.uk)
Read all Rapid Responses