Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;333:262 (29 July), doi:10.1136/bmj.333.7561.262-a
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORRoff contributes to the debate over whether payment should be offered for kidney donors by citing various examples that dispel the myth that the value of life and limb cannot be put into monetary terms.1 We assume the acceptance of the general principle of payment and propose a two part payment scheme that maximises the incentive for organs to be donated but at the same time preserves an element of the gift relationship in the transaction. This, like other methods of payment previously proposed, would entail the purchase of organs by the state and their allocation free of charge to patients on the basis of existing algorithms.2 3
The first part of the scheme would be a fixed base payment financed directly by government. In principle, the cost savings associated with transplant v dialysis would indicate an upper limit to an amount that could be paidone estimate is $90
Stephen Jan, senior health economist
George Institute for International Health, PO Box M201, Missenden Road, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia sjan@george.org.au
Mardi Thompson, chair
National Council of Consumer Advocates for Kidney Health Australia, PO Box 9993, Sydney, NSW 2001