Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;333:201-202 (22 July), doi:10.1136/bmj.333.7560.201-c
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORDu Toit et al's finding of a one in 10 chance of patients over age 45 presenting with rectal bleeding and subsequently being diagnosed with colorectal cancer is comparable to other recent studies,1 2 but their data were collected from a single rural practice in the United Kingdom, including less than 300 patients. A recent population based, case-control study consisting of over 1500 patients has shown that residence in a rural area was associated with an increased risk of colon cancer (odds ratio 1.4, 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 1.8).3 However, a large epidemiological study of around 500 000 patients shows that black men who reside in metropolitan areas have a higher risk of colorectal cancer than black men who reside in rural areas.4 Both these studies have evaluated populations in the United States, but UK populations are similar. It is therefore important to consider both urban and rural
Sanjay Purkayastha, clinical research fellow
s.purkayastha@imperial.ac.uk, Department of Biosurgery and Surgical Technology, Imperial College, London W2 1NY
Ara Darzi, professor
Department of Biosurgery and Surgical Technology, Imperial College, London W2 1NY
Read all Rapid Responses