Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;333:201 (22 July), doi:10.1136/bmj.333.7560.201-b
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORDu Toit et al emphasise the importance of rectal bleeding in primary care and try to address this important management dilemma.1 One potential weakness of the study, however, was its assumption that bleeding was caused by any neoplasia found, rather than more common causes. The character of rectal bleeding (bright red v dark) was not mentioned, nor was the coexistence of piles, probably because rigid sigmoidoscopy rather than proctoscopy was carried out. In addition, the presence of anal symptoms, usually due to piles, which is a protective factor to the finding of neoplasia, was not said to be recorded.
As Weller's editorial in the same issue says,2 the specific characteristics of the bleeding are important to record; if the colour of the blood was recorded it may help plan investigations. Bright red bleeding is well investigated by flexible sigmoidoscopy, but it is generally agreed that darker bleeding usually
Christopher M Newman, specialist registrar general surgery
chrisnewman@doctors.org.uk, Poole General Hospital, Poole BH15 2JB
Guy F Nash, consultant colorectal surgeon, Tom Armstrong, specialist registrar general surgery, Kieren Darcy, senior house officer general surgery
Poole General Hospital, Poole BH15 2JB