Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;333:107-108 (15 July), doi:10.1136/bmj.333.7559.107
A draft bill on the coroner system misses important chances
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The UK government has recently published a draft bill for reform of the investigation of deaths in England and Wales by the coroner system.1 A coroner is an independent judicial officer and must be a barrister, solicitor, or, currently, a medical practitioner of not less than five years' standing (the last qualification is abolished in the draft bill). This proposed legislation heralds many changes, several with implications for doctors (box). These are all sensible evolutionary changes that will lead to a more consistent, effective, and better managed service. There are several problems, however, that the draft bill does not tackle.
The draft bill fails to cover important recommendations made by a government review of death certification and investigation,2 by the Shipman Inquiry (which followed the murder of more than 200 patients by general practitioner Harold Shipman),3 and by the UK Home Office.4 Moreover, it does not give detailed instructions
Richard Baker, professor of quality of health care
Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 6TP
(rb14@le.ac.uk)
Stephen Cordner, professor of forensic medicine
Monash University, Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine, Southbank, Victoria 3006, Australia