Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;333 (15 July), doi:10.1136/bmj.333.7559.0-f
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
It's traditional at the BMJ to worry about the B. It stands for British in case you didn't know. On the one hand we are very proud of it but sometimes it seems to stand between us and our international aspirations. A few years ago our editorial board seriously discussed changing the name to the Global or the World Medical Journal. Nothing happened so I guess the decision was no.
Now I have a new worry. Have we become the English Medical Journal? So much of our coverage is about England, so little about the other parts of the UK. In the past month we ran four editorials and 19 news stories on the NHS. All except one were about the NHS in England. Perhaps there is nothing going on elsewhere in the UK, but I don't think so. I think we have defaulted to the same biases
Fiona Godlee, editor
(fgodlee@bmj.com)
Read all Rapid Responses
UK medical students have published unreleased government plans to restrict failed asylum seekers' access to medical care