Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;333:44 (1 July), doi:10.1136/bmj.333.7557.44
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORYour reports referring to childhood obesity definitions in the USA and the International Obesity Task Force (IOTF) contained errors.1 2 The task force is part of the International Association for the Study of Obesity (IASO), this year celebrating its 20th anniversary as the body uniting researchers, clinicians, health professionals, and others concerned with obesity worldwide.
The IOTF has no role in the childhood obesity expert group convened by the American Medical Association, the Centers for Disease Control, and the Health Resources and Services Administration. You report a proposal to adopt the 85th and 95th centiles as reference points for overweight and obesity in children. In the USA these cut-off points are termed "at risk" and "overweight."3 Your readers may judge whether this is an effort to "expand the definition" of obesity and whether your imputation of some attempt to exaggerate the obesity problem has any foundation.
You refer to
Neville Rigby, director of policy and public affairs
International Association for the Study of Obesity, London NW1 2NS nrigby@iaso.org
Read all Rapid Responses