Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;333 (1 July), doi:10.1136/bmj.333.7557.0-f
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
How representative is the BMA's annual representative meeting? If it is representative, there's an astonishing consensus among UK doctors about the health service we want. Last week's meeting in Belfast stopped short of affiliating with "Keep our NHS public"a pressure group founded last year because of "an urgent need to defend the NHS" (see news on bmj.com). But there was no mistaking the passion among BMA representatives for a publicly funded, freely available national health service.
A few people spoke against funding through general taxation, pointing to the European social insurance model, which delivers higher quality care, though at higher cost. And a few spoke against care being free at the point of access, suggesting that charges would moderate demand, enhance patient responsibility, and help bridge the funding gap. But when it came to a vote, support for the founding principles of the NHS was overwhelming (p 9
Fiona Godlee, editor
(fgodlee@bmj.com)
Read all Rapid Responses
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+