Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;332:1512-1513 (24 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7556.1512-b
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORMoon and Bogle should be supported in their call to move from branded to generic statins.1 However, by using the costing tool of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE),2 they have probably overestimated the benefits of statins.
The 10 year risk thresholds for cardiovascular disease for starting a statin in primary prevention have recently been reduced from 40% to 20%.2 3 The NICE tool models the impact of this change by adding together the effect of statins on a range of cardiovascular events by using trial findings for fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction, angina, transient ischaemic attack, and stroke. I have tested this approach by comparing the results of the NICE tool with a new analysis of Scottish health survey 1998 data.4
When population figures for Lothian, Scotland (population 779 000) are used, the NICE tool estimates that 23 648 additional people would receive statins with
D Graham Mackenzie, specialist registrar in public health
Public Health Department, NHS Fife, Windygates, Fife KY8 5RG gm@nhs.net