BMJ  2006;332:1512-1513 (24 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7556.1512-b

Letter

Switching statins

NICE tool overestimates benefits of statins

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

EDITOR—Moon and Bogle should be supported in their call to move from branded to generic statins.1 However, by using the costing tool of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE),2 they have probably overestimated the benefits of statins.

The 10 year risk thresholds for cardiovascular disease for starting a statin in primary prevention have recently been reduced from 40% to 20%.2 3 The NICE tool models the impact of this change by adding together the effect of statins on a range of cardiovascular events by using trial findings for fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction, angina, transient ischaemic attack, and stroke. I have tested this approach by comparing the results of the NICE tool with a new analysis of Scottish health survey 1998 data.4

When population figures for Lothian, Scotland (population 779 000) are used, the NICE tool estimates that 23 648 additional people would receive statins with . . . [Full text of this article]

D Graham Mackenzie, specialist registrar in public health

Public Health Department, NHS Fife, Windygates, Fife KY8 5RG gm@nhs.net


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Switching statins
James C Moon and Richard G Bogle
BMJ 2006 332: 1344-1345. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ