Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;332:1511 (24 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7556.1511
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORI agree with Ganguli and Strassnig that truly novel antipsychotic agents are needed.1 They talk about older antipsychotics not becoming obsolete in clinical practice, while the amount of research that is conducted solely into their efficacy is slim. We remain in the dark when it comes to comparing typical antipsychotics, individualising them to the needs of a patient. The evidence base is anecdotal. They are effective in clinical practice; every psychiatrist has a cohort of patients stabilised on them, followed up regularly and maintained similarly lest they should decompensate. However, the pharmaceutical industry pours funds into development of newer compounds or newer licences for existing "novel" antipsychotics, and the older ones fade into the background, serving mainly as adjuvant to the control of behavioural symptoms on the inpatient unit.
Safer avenues of antipsychotic prescription need to be explored, given that the metabolic syndrome, glucose metabolism abnormalities, and accelerated
Arnob Chakraborti, senior house officer
Dorothy Pattison Hospital, Walsall Primary Care Trust, Walsall WS2 9XH ac97dmc@googlemail.com