Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;332:1462-1463 (24 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7556.1462
Medical associations' statements on human rights are welcome, but we all need to do more to prevent abuses
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
It is our duty as doctors to reject any attempt to bend our ethical aim to do no harm and to alleviate suffering. We should also actively resist any attempt, however powerful, to corrupt the idea of human dignity.
Prompted by concerns about detainees' human rights in US military prisons, several medical associations have spoken out in the past month about the role of doctors in interrogation. These statements should bring medical debate on human rights to the forefrontalong with news of the deaths of three prisoners in the US base at Guantanamo Bay1 and the recent statement by the Council of Europe Secretary General. This says that "Legislative and administrative measures effectively to protect individuals against violations of human rights committed by agents of foreign security services operating on the territory of member States appear to be the exception rather than the rule."2
One of the main reasons
Luis Justo, professor in charge, bioethics
Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Catamarca 140, Cipolletti (8324), Argentina
(justo@maipue.com)
Read all Rapid Responses