Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;332:1335-1336 (3 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7553.1335-b
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORThe Langwith case reached the High Court over whether there was an obligation to activate section 11 of the 2001 Health and Social Care Act, in this particular case.1 The act states, among other things, that patients should be involved in the development and consideration of proposals for changes in the "way" in which their services are provided.
The national debate on privatisation is a separate issue, but the publicity given to this case has been an important part of informing people how the culture and the drivers are changing in the NHS. Although, when we put in our bid, we had no idea of what was about to happen, we subsequently allowed our bid to be used as an illustration of process.
| |||||||||||
I believe that the NHS belongs to the electorate and not to the government or professionals. It is worrying that the views
Elizabeth D Barrett, general practitioner
Shires Health Care, Shirebrook, Derbyshire NG20 8DG elizabeth.barrett@nhs.net