Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;332:1333 (3 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7553.1333-a
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORCommendably, Owen et al are committed to reducing inappropriate intravenous antibiotic prescribing but we are concerned by some of their assumptions.1 Although the guidelines from the British Thoracic Society state that patients with a CURB-65 score of 0 or 1 are likely to be suitable for home treatment, Hoare and Lim have recognised that clinical judgment is also needed.2 Similarly, recent guidance from the Department of Health and Health Protection Agency on the management of Panton-Valentine leukocidin associated staphylococcal pneumonia has stated that CURB-65 may be misleadingly low in fit young adults.3 In a study in our own institution over the last year (in preparation) five of 40 patients with a CURB-65 score of 1 at presentation required care in a high dependency unit or intensive care unit.
We would be concerned if blind adherence to a score designed for mortality prognostication without reference to the current or
Kirsty Challen, research fellow, emergency medicine
kirsty.challen@smtr.nhs.uk, South Manchester University Hospitals Trust, Manchester M23 9LT
Darren Walter, clinical director, emergency medicine, John Bright, specialist registrar, respiratory medicine, Andrew Bentley, consultant, respiratory medicine and critical care
South Manchester University Hospitals Trust, Manchester M23 9LT