Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;332:1287-1288 (3 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7553.1287
Doctors need to broaden their approach to pain in older patients
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Several cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors (COX 2 inhibitors) have been withdrawn from sale in many countries. The use of other drugs in this class is being limited by their potential to cause cardiac effects. As Kearney and colleagues show (p 1302), this concern is valid, since they have been associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction with prolonged use as compared with placebo or other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.1
Have we lost a truly superior option? Probably not. Although COX 2 inhibitors were marketed as being less likely to cause gastrointestinal distress and ulceration, there is good evidence that other pharmacological and non-drug options may be reasonably effective, equally safe, and less costly.
COX 2 inhibitors rose to market prominence on the basis of premarketing and postmarketing studies showing less ulceration, on endoscopy, of the gastrointestinal tract. However, ulceration is neither intrinsically harmful nor a surrogate marker for harm
Allen F Shaughnessy, adjunct professor of public health and family medicine
Tufts University Family Medicine Residency, 100 Hospital Road, Malden, MA 02148, USA
(Allen.Shaughnessy@Tufts.edu)
Andrea E Gordon, clinical assistant professor of public health and family medicine
Tufts University Family Medicine Residency, 100 Hospital Road, Malden, MA 02148, USA
Read all Rapid Responses