BMJ  2006;332:1275 (27 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7552.1275-a

Letter

Dame Janet's disappointments

It's not that easy to keep an eye on each other

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

EDITOR—Firstly, can we put Harold Shipman aside?1 2 What he did was horrible, but basing a system of revalidation on the actions of a psychopathic mass murderer is absurd. No matter what system is put in place, it will not stop the psychopath, just as all the fences in the world will not stop a suicide bomber.

The whole problem with keeping an eye on one another is no one knows what we are keeping an eye on. What is a "good enough" doctor? We can all enumerate the qualities of a "good" doctor—compassionate, knowledgeable, in possession of clinical skills, and dependable with a healthy dose of common sense, for starters. But can we define the doctor who needs to be struck off? That is a whole different story. Sadly, and I am not surprised Dame Janet doesn't get this as I suspect she inhabits the black and white . . . [Full text of this article]

William E Osmun, family doctor

Mount Brydges, Ontario, Canada N0L 1W0 ted@smhc.net


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Chairwoman of Shipman inquiry protests at lack of action
Tessa Richards
BMJ 2006 332: 1111. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Dame Janet's disappointments
Glyn Elwyn
BMJ 2006 332: 1161. [Extract] [Full Text]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ