Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;332:1272 (27 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7552.1272-a
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORCosta et al draw the principal conclusion that diabetic patients benefit more, in both primary and secondary prevention.1 But it is abundantly clear from their own analysis that the relative risk reduction was similar across all categories of patient
The numbers needed to treat remain as expected, reflecting, as they must, the absolute baseline risk and the 22% risk reduction across the board. Costa adds nothing new in recognising that, all other things being equal, diabetic patients have a higher absolute coronary risk. So what does this study add? There are no new important clinical implications, for primary prevention in patients with type 2 diabetes. It confirms that we should not change our guidelines.
Patients will benefit from lipid lowering in accordance with their absolute cardiovascular risk. We should continue to target treatment according to best available predictions of absolute cardiovascular risk. Progress will come from improving the
L S Lewis, general practitioner
Surgery, Newport, Pembrokeshire SA42 0TJ sam@garthnewydd.freeserve.co.uk