Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;332:1226-1227 (27 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7552.1226
Important, but maybe just too ambitious
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
In his report on the resources required to provide high quality health services in Britain, Sir Derek Wanless concluded that "little comprehensive information is collected on the health status of the population,"1 making it impossible to track, at local level, trends in major risk factors and in patterns of disease. England's Department of Health has now decided that something must be done to tackle this problem and is seeking views on a proposed new strategy for providing such information, Informing healthier choices: information and intelligence for healthy populations."2
The government should be congratulated for developing a vision in which real-time, high quality public health data will be delivered via "public health desktops" to a highly trained and integrated public health and local authority work force. It notes correctly that this will be essential for achieving the fully engaged scenario envisaged in Wanless's first report (about the long term trends
Rosalind Raine, professor of health services research
(r.raine@ucl.ac.uk), Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London WC1E 6BT
Sylvia Godden, honorary research fellow
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London WC1E 6BT
Martin McKee, professor of European public health
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT
Read all Rapid Responses