Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;332:1225-1226 (27 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7552.1225
Perhaps the main benefit is to encourage patients to voice embarrassing problems
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
People often have difficulty in fully expressing their concerns in consultations with doctors1 and this may adversely affect outcomes. Some issues go unvoiced or are introduced in a "by the way" presentation at the end of the consultation. The temporal order by which patients present their agendas may not reflect their perceived importance or match the doctor's prioritisation. The first item raised may be the most socially acceptable, and the last (or unvoiced) itemsuch as breast lumps or rectal bleedingmay be the vaguest or most embarrassing.
If they have time doctors may try to counter this by an open question, asking if there are any other problems.2 But doctors have to work within time constraints, and a few actively discourage the presentation of more than one problem per consultation. Examining the issue of patients' agendastheir ideas, concerns and expectationsbrings out the tension between a patient-centred model of the consultation and
William Hamilton, senior research fellow
(w.t.hamilton@btopenworld.com), Department of Community Based Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1AU
Nicky Britten, professor
Institute of Health and Social Care Research, Peninsula Medical School, Exeter EX1 2LU
Read all Rapid Responses