Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;332:1154 (13 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7550.1154-a
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORScott implies that depression is always a timeless, free-standing, internally coherent, universally valid, pathological entity with a life of its own out there.1 Classification systems (generally called international but in fact merely Western) provide definitions which seem to assume this. However, disclaimers in small print say in effect that diagnostic categories are not facts of nature (as, say, a tree is) but cobbled together phenomena emerging as committee decisions. Indeed, it was not inevitable that depressed mood should be seen as the cardinal symptom and name the whole syndrome. Other symptoms could have been used: sleep disorder syndrome or concentration and drive disorder syndrome.
What is the evidence that depression is under-recognised and undertreated? Some might point to a few community surveys using quantitative instruments supposedly tapping depression. Such instruments, with their demand characteristics and narrow focus on symptoms, generate inflated estimates of prevalence because of their structural
Derek A Summerfield, honorary senior lecturer
Institute of Psychiatry, Maudsley Hospital, London SE5 8AP derek.summerfield@slam.nhs.uk
Read all Rapid Responses