Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;332:1093 (6 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7549.1093-a
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORIn contrast to Bottle and Aylin,1 we found that delayed surgery alone seems not to increase mortality after hip fracture after adjustment for comorbidity, age and sex, and taking hospital level variability into account.
We examined data from regional hospital discharge registers in Friuli Venezia Giulia, a region in northeastern Italy (population 1 200 000), where each year more than 2200 elderly people are admitted for hip fracture. We selected all patients aged 65 and older with a main diagnosis of hip fracture that was surgically treated during 1996-2005, excluding patients with malignant neoplasm. In cases of multiple hip fracture we included only the first episode.
We considered all diagnoses coded in the hospital discharge records and in those of the previous year, calculating the Charlson comorbidity index for each patient2 and dichotomising it such that 1 indicated presence of comorbidity and 0 absence. We dichotomised the waiting
Antonella Franzo, epidemiologist
antonella.franzo@sanita.fvg.it, Agenzia Regionale della Sanità, piazzale Santa Maria della Misericordia 15, 33100 Udine, Italy
Giorgio Simon, epidemiologist, Carlo Francescutti, epidemiologist
Agenzia Regionale della Sanità, piazzale Santa Maria della Misericordia 15, 33100 Udine, Italy