Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;332:1035 (29 April), doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7548.1035-a
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORThe UK part of the Interphone study concluded that mobile phone use is not associated with an increased risk of glioma.1 However,
10 years ipsilateral use yielded an odds ratio of 1.60 (95% confidence interval 0.92 to 2.76) and contralateral use an odds ratio of 0.78 (0.85 to 1.3).
Only 51% of the cases and 45% of the controls participated. Controls were more affluent than non-participating controls and participating cases. Mobile phone use is associated with social class. In our study use of cellular telephones was reported by 48% of the most affluent cases and 36% of the least affluent.2 3
| |||||||||||
Use of cordless telephones was not assessed and in the analysis of laterality the "unexposed" group contained subjects with exposure to microwaves on the opposite side of the head.
In table 3, 13 of the 14 odds ratios are < 1.0 and one is >
Lennart Hardell, professor
Department of Oncology, University Hospital, SE-701 85 örebro, Sweden lennart.hardell@orebroll.se
Kjell Hansson Mild, professor
National Institute for Working Life, SE-907 13 Umeå, Sweden
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+