Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;332:1034 (29 April), doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7548.1034-a
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORIn investigating the diagnostic utility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in cases of suspected multiple sclerosis, Whiting et al have evaluated imaging findings reported in many different studiesmainly whether there are any lesions present in a brain scan.1 This approach does not reflect real life, where neurologists use a more detailed interpretation of MRI abnormalities in the context of the clinical findings to reach a diagnosis. Clinicians deal with many different clinical settings that make the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis more or less likely and also have to consider the differential diagnosis. An early and reliable diagnosis facilitates best management and alleviates anxiety due to diagnostic uncertainty. While the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis is based primarily on clinical manifestations, it is often helpfullyand sometimes cruciallysupported by laboratory investigations. When used appropriately, MRIand sometimes cerebrospinal fluid and neurophysiological (evoked potentials) examinationimproves diagnostic accuracy and helps exclude or identify other
David H Miller, professor of clinical neurology
Institute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3BG d.miller@ion.ucl.ac.uk