BMJ  2006;332 (29 April), doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7548.0-f

Editor's choice

Where next for the research assessment exercise?

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

The rules for deciding who gets public money for research in the United Kingdom are set to change. The world's largest research assessment exercise (RAE)—which has dominated the lives of UK academics for the past 20 years—is to be ditched after the next round in 2008, and consultation begins next month to find an alternative. This week's BMJ carries the first of a series of contributions debating the future of research assessment in the UK and around the world.

Many will welcome an end to the tyranny of the RAE. It has clearly succeeded in concentrating funds within selected high performing institutions, which was the government's aim, but at a high cost, say its critics. The cost includes distorting the research agenda by favouring pure science over applied or practice based research and encouraging safe, mainstream research that will deliver publications within a few years. Riskier, longer term research, research . . . [Full text of this article]

Fiona Godlee, editor

(fgodlee@bmj.com)


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Public disclosure of the cost of research
Ludovic Reveiz, MD, MSc
bmj.com, 28 Apr 2006 [Full text]
Globalisation & Metamorphosis in Healthcare
Narasimhaiah Srinivasaiah
bmj.com, 2 May 2006 [Full text]
Medical research: losing the bearings
Dr. Rajesh Chauhan
bmj.com, 5 May 2006 [Full text]
Assessment of academic research in New Zealand
Jonathan M Hughes
bmj.com, 5 May 2006 [Full text]
prescriptive psychiatric screening
william alan johnstone
bmj.com, 12 May 2006 [Full text]
Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student BMJ