Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;332:973 (22 April), doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7547.973-b
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOROf the 900 doctors who signed up to support an insurance based funding for a national health service, only three are general practitioners and no one claims to be working in the discipline of public health.1
It can be no coincidence that the majority of those who support this reform are hospital specialiststhose who are most likely to benefit from an insurance-based system, in which users of health care can access whatever specialist they think they need, and however many, until they get an opinion or treatment they want. This leads to a consumerist and demand driven health care (more cosmetic procedures), not one that is based on need (health promotion and public health interventions, for example).
Insurance based systems favour supplier-induced demand, as well as high-cost curative procedures with little impact on long term health outcome and even less in terms of public health.
Let's not forget
Richard Ma, general practitioner
Village Practice, London N7 7JJ richard.ma@btinternet.com