Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;332:855 (8 April), doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7545.855-b
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORRecently the Californian Medical Board dismissed a complaint of medical mistreatment brought against Dr E.1 2 The complaint was dismissed because Dr E was superintendent of medical services at Guantanamo. He works for the military.1 2
By dismissing the complaint on these grounds the board has clearly subjugated its authority to the army and legitimised the employment of a modern day state inquisitor. We think that our own General Medical Council acts just as spinelessly, abrogating its responsibilities to unnamed military authorities.
In 2004 one of us (AR) asked the legal adviser to the GMC to consider a report that British doctors regularly supported torture (sorry, "stressing") sessions.3 He wrote to the British Surgeon General's Office, who "rejected any suggestion of British Forces being involved in torture." More importantly, he informed us that the GMC would not investigate the claim, not because he doubted its seriousness but because the council
Christopher J Burns-Cox, consultant physician
Wotton-under-Edge, Gloucestershire GL12 7PB chris.burns-cox@virgin.net
Andrew Rouse, consultant in public health
Birmingham Heartlands Primary Care Trust, Birmingham B15 3RU
David Halpin, retired consultant orthopaedic surgeon
Newton Abbott, Devon TQ13 9XR
Vidhu Mayor, general practitioner
Sparkbrook, Birmingham B12 8HE
Tom Marshall, senior lecturer
University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT