Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;332:855 (8 April), doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7545.855-a
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORWilks makes a compelling case for doctors to adhere to the ethical parameters set in the Tokyo and Malta declarations.1-3 Another concern for medical practitioners working in centres where torture is practised must be about treating individuals for moderate to severe medical and surgical conditions, only to render them fit to face further torture and abuse.
Evidence exists that inmates may have various mental health problems in detention centres.4 5 Furthermore, it can be difficult for the medical practitioners adequately to assess the mental state of their patients when these are in a weak and poor physical condition.
To prevent inmates being exposed to imposed or forced treatments international consensus needs to be achieved on obtaining an independently witnessed (representatives of Red Cross or other such organisations) and explicitly worded written consent. This consent must be reviewed periodically. There should also be an arrangement for legally binding advance directives
Sabahat A Wasti, consultant in rehabilitation medicine
Northern General Hospital, Sheffield S5 7AU asim.wasti@barnsleypct.nhs.uk
Sajid Z Bhatti, staff physician rehabilitation medicine
Portsmouth Hospitals Trust, Portsmouth