BMJ  2006;332:854 (8 April), doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7545.854-b

Letter

The CMA's legitimation crisis

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

EDITOR—The Canadian Medical Association (CMA) now faces a legitimation problem over its failure to explain why it fired the CMAJ editors. Thousands of medical professionals have signed a petition to reinstate the editors who have brought international recognition to the CMAJ. There have been calls from leading medical and science journals, as well as national newspapers, to explain why the editors were fired.

Yet the CMA has offered scant and conflicting information on the issue.1 It has also lost an opportunity to put the issue to rest, save face and restore confidence among its members, the public, and the international journalistic community. The president of the CMA has noted that the panel formed by the CMA to examine a future governance framework for the CMAJ will not investigate circumstances surrounding the editors being fired.2 Clearly this leaves the issue unresolved. Nor is the CMA bound by the . . . [Full text of this article]

Mark H Wilson, director of medical ethics

Health Research Associates, Ottawa K2B 6J4, Canada healthresearch@sympatico.ca


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Most of CMAJ editorial board resigns
David Spurgeon
BMJ 2006 332: 687. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ