Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;332:854 (8 April), doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7545.854-b
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORThe Canadian Medical Association (CMA) now faces a legitimation problem over its failure to explain why it fired the CMAJ editors. Thousands of medical professionals have signed a petition to reinstate the editors who have brought international recognition to the CMAJ. There have been calls from leading medical and science journals, as well as national newspapers, to explain why the editors were fired.
Yet the CMA has offered scant and conflicting information on the issue.1 It has also lost an opportunity to put the issue to rest, save face and restore confidence among its members, the public, and the international journalistic community. The president of the CMA has noted that the panel formed by the CMA to examine a future governance framework for the CMAJ will not investigate circumstances surrounding the editors being fired.2 Clearly this leaves the issue unresolved. Nor is the CMA bound by the
Mark H Wilson, director of medical ethics
Health Research Associates, Ottawa K2B 6J4, Canada healthresearch@sympatico.ca