Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;332:812 (8 April), doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7545.812-c
Quebec David Spurgeon
The authors of a popular series of articles published in the CMAJ, the journal of the Canadian Medical Association (CMA), have threatened to withhold further submissions unless the journal’s owners clarify the reasons why its two top editors were fired (BMJ 2006;332:503, 4 Mar).
Gordon Guyatt of McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, spokesman for the 11 leading academic physicians, says a credible explanation for why the editors were dismissed is needed to ensure the journal’s editorial autonomy. He and his colleagues have given the owners several weeks to respond.
He said, “Not that we are terribly optimistic about the outcome, but we’ll be interested to see what develops. It seems they are ready to endure any volume of negative publicity to protect their effective control over the journal, which is a shame.”
The CMA contends that the two issues—the firings and the question of editorial
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
UK medical students have published unreleased government plans to restrict failed asylum seekers' access to medical care