Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;332:804-805 (8 April), doi:10.1136/bmj.38797.621516.47 (published 24 March 2006)
The increasing prevalence of chronic infection, mainly due to immigration from endemic areas, may warrant universal immunisation
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The World Health Organization recommended that, by 1997, all countries should introduce a programme of universal immunisation against hepatitis B at birth, in infancy, or in adolescence, according to endemicity.1 By the end of 2005, 168 countries worldwide and 44 of 52 countries in WHO's European region had implemented this. The United Kingdom continues to implement a selective immunisation programme for hepatitis B, targeting high risk groups and screening all women attending antenatal clinics so that the babies of any infected mothers can be immunised at birth. This approach has come in for some criticism, not only internationally but also within the UK.2 Should the UK now adopt universal immunisation against hepatitis B?
In contrast with other European countries, particularly in southern Europe, the UK has one of the lowest incidences of hepatitis B infection worldwide,3 but has about 180 000 people with chronic hepatitis B infection.4 The Netherlands
Jangu Banatvala, emeritus professor of clinical virology
King's College London School of Medicine, St Thomas's Campus, London SE1 7EH
(jangu@btopenworld.com)
Pierre Van Damme, director
WHO Collaborating Centre for Control and Prevention of Viral Hepatitis, University of Antwerp, Belgium
Nedret Emiroglu, adviser
Vaccine Preventable Diseases and Immunization, WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark
Read all Rapid Responses