Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;332:795 (1 April), doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7544.795-a
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORWe agree with Nisbet that standard available needles may be inappropriate for gluteal intramuscular injections, especially when the incidence of obesity is increasing.1 However, his paper seems to exaggerate the problem.
Firstly, there are other preferred sites for intramuscular injectionsfor example, the mid-deltoid, rectus femoris, and vastus lateralis.2 Simpler clinical variables such as the weight of the patient, muscle mass of the injection site, and the amount of subcutaneous fat should be assessed for choosing the correct needle length.3
In this study the sole criterion for the assessment of subcutaneous fat at gluteal region was the need to undergo the computed tomography scans of the pelvis without mentioning the indication for which this was performed. Without knowing the underlying indication it is hard to estimate how many of these patients would have required gluteal intramuscular injections.
Secondly, antiemetics and analgesics are the common drugs given intramuscularly. However, the
Saurabh Rai, vascular research fellow
University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Selly Oak Hospital, Birmingham B29 6JD saurabh_rai@hotmail.com
Nidhi Nandan, senior house officer
Royal Shrewsbury Hospital, Shrewsbury SY3 8XQ