Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;332:729 (25 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7543.729
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORTwenty eight (100%) hospice inpatients at least five days into thromboprophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin found it acceptable.1 The potential for lengthened life appeared the main reason for wanting prophylaxis and none knew any common symptoms of venous thromboembolism. All had irreversible deteriorations in performance status, and, as cancer itself is a risk for venous thromboembolism, any case for low molecular weight heparins for hospice inpatients logically continues for life.
Such thromboprophylaxis in advanced cancer does not improve one year survival.2 It possibly reduces the risk of symptomatic venous thromboembolism by 20% but bleeding complications rise by 80%. Administering low molecular weight heparin to 190 patients with advanced cancer might prevent one symptomatic venous thromboembolism. Based on these figures, our charity's annual drug costs would increase by roughly 28% (£6970;
10 051; $12 245) to provide low molecular weight heparin to all our inpatients, and the associated
John C Chambers, Macmillan consultant
Katharine House Hospice, Adderbury, Oxfordshire OX17 3NL dr.ch@mbers.info