BMJ  2006;332 (25 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7543.0-f

Editor's choice

Count the harms

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Hippocrates may not have foreseen the complexities of modern medicine, but 24 centuries ago he (or whoever wrote the Hippocratic Oath) set down a fundamental rule for all clinicians and researchers—"first do no harm." This rule has special resonance this week as we explore over-diagnosis in breast cancer screening, and the evolving clinical trial nightmare at Northwick Park.

Three weeks ago an editorial in the BMJ concluded that despite limitations, breast cancer screening does save lives (BMJ 2006;332: 499-500[Free Full Text]). But in the same issue of the journal we published an analysis by Karsten Juhl Jørgensen and Peter Gøtzsche of the letters inviting women for screening (BMJ 2006;332: 538-541[Free Full Text]). None of the letters mentioned the major harms of screening, and the authors concluded that organisers of screening programmes have a serious conflict of interest in wanting high uptake, which . . . [Full text of this article]

Fiona Godlee, editor

(fgodlee@bmj.com)


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Evaluating new screening tests for breast cancer
Les Irwig, Nehmat Houssami, Bruce Armstrong, and Paul Glasziou
BMJ 2006 332: 678-679. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Severe adverse reactions prompt call for trial design changes
Susan Mayor
BMJ 2006 332: 683. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Ramifications of screening for breast cancer: 1 in 4 cancers detected by mammography are pseudocancers
H Gilbert Welch, Lisa M Schwartz, and Steven Woloshin
BMJ 2006 332: 727. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Ramifications of screening for breast cancer: Consent for screening
Michael Baum
BMJ 2006 332: 728. [Extract] [Full Text]

My life as a guinea pig
Kate Mandeville
BMJ 2006 332: 735. [Extract] [Full Text]

Rate of over-diagnosis of breast cancer 15 years after end of Malmö mammographic screening trial: follow-up study
Sophia Zackrisson, Ingvar Andersson, Lars Janzon, Jonas Manjer, and Jens Peter Garne
BMJ 2006 332: 689-692. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Over-diagnosis in breast cancer screening
Henrik Møller and Elizabeth Davies
BMJ 2006 332: 691-692. [Full Text] [PDF]

Learning from the TGN1412 trial
Michael Goodyear
BMJ 2006 332: 677-678. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Screening for breast cancer
J Michael Dixon
BMJ 2006 332: 499-500. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Content of invitations for publicly funded screening mammography
Karsten Juhl Jørgensen and Peter C Gøtzsche
BMJ 2006 332: 538-541. [Full Text] [PDF]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Screening Mammography: The Missing Link
Lynn Howard Ehrle
bmj.com, 26 Mar 2006 [Full text]
Public enquiry needed for TGN1412 trial
Usha K. Sharma
bmj.com, 27 Mar 2006 [Full text]
Count for the harms
David Isaacs
bmj.com, 27 Mar 2006 [Full text]

Student BMJ

Asylum seekers' care

UK medical students have published unreleased government plans to restrict failed asylum seekers' access to medical care

www.student.bmj.com

Listen to the latest BMJ Interview