Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;332:614 (11 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7541.614
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
There is no doubt that the expansion of orthopaedic services, provided by the Department of Health through private hospitals and independent sector treatment centres (ISTCs), has been a much needed development, but it has occurred at a price. Admittedly there are many patients who have benefited from the development of ISTCs and are now leading pain free lives as a result of surgery carried out much earlier than would have been possible in the early 1990s, when our health service was grossly underfunded. However, the number of patients we are seeing with problems resulting from poor surgeryincorrectly inserted prostheses, technical errors, and infected joint replacementsis too great.
| The number of patients we are seeing with problems resulting from poor surgery is too great
|
Perhaps we should look at the mechanisms through which this whole ISTC exercise has been carried out. Surgeons from overseas have been flown into the United
W Angus Wallace, professor of orthopaedic and accident surgery
University of Nottingham Angus.Wallace@RCSEd.ac.uk
Read all Rapid Responses