Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;332:562-563 (11 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7541.562
The choice of drug or drug combinations is bewildering
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Most adult patients with refractory epilepsy have partial (focal) seizures with or without secondary generalisation. During the 1970s and early 1980s studies showed that in 70-80% of adults with newly diagnosed epilepsy, seizures were controlled successfully by carefully monitored monotherapy with any of the four standard antiepileptic drugsphenobarbital, phenytoin, carbamazepine, or sodium valproateall of which seemed to have similar efficacy in partial epilepsy in later comparative trials of monotherapy.1-4 Furthermore, adding a second drug for patients with continuing seizures on optimum monotherapy led to modest benefit in no more than one third, a deterioration in seizure control or unacceptable toxicity in about a quarter, and no change in the rest.2 5
These studies led to important questions. Should patients unresponsive to the optimum use of the first drug be switched to alternative monotherapy or treated with polytherapy? If so, which drug or drug combination is appropriate?
Twenty years later these
Edward Reynolds, honorary senior lecturer
Institute of Epileptology, King's College, London SE5 6PJ
(reynolds@buckles.u-net.com)
Read all Rapid Responses
UK medical students have published unreleased government plans to restrict failed asylum seekers' access to medical care