BMJ  2006;332:490 (25 February), doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7539.490-b

Letter

Referrals between consultants

Consultant referrals are funded

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

EDITOR—Goodman correctly says that consultant to consultant referrals are not part of the monitoring of waiting time standards for trusts and therefore may be given less priority by trust managers.1 However, he is mistaken in his assertion that consultant to consultant referrals are not funded and that this may also influence how managers behave.

Under payment by results, all outpatient attendances are charged at tariff. First outpatient appointments have a higher tariff than follow-up attendances, but the source of the referral is not relevant. Primary care trusts therefore fund trusts for consultant to consultant referrals in exactly the same way as they do for general practitioners' referrals. It is this issue that is driving some primary care trusts to try to get a better grip on referrals between consultants.

There will always be perverse incentives in a bureaucracy as complex as the NHS, but it is important to . . . [Full text of this article]

Tim E P Davies, director of public health

South Worcestershire Primary Care Trust, Worcester WR4 9RW tep.davies@btinternet.com


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Defending referrals between consultants
Michael Goodman
BMJ 2006 332: 371. [Extract] [Full Text]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Tertiary referrals: thin end of the wedge?
Andrew N Bamji
bmj.com, 27 Feb 2006 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ