Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;332:439 (25 February), doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7539.439
Clare Dyer, legal correspondent
BMJ
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Doctors and other expert witnesses who give their evidence honestly and in good faith are immune from disciplinary proceedings over anything they say in court, a senior judge at the High Court in London ruled in a ground breaking judgment last week.
Mr Justice Collins held that Roy Meadow, the retired paediatrician who was found guilty of serious professional misconduct and was ordered to be struck off the medical register last year for his role in the Sally Clark murder trial, should never even have been brought before the General Medical Council (BMJ 2005;331: 177
The ruling makes new law by extending to action by regulators the longstanding immunity from civil actions over their evidence that witnesses in court cases enjoy.
The judge said that regulators such as the GMC could take action only if a complaint about an expert witness was referred by a
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses