Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;332 (18 February), doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7538.0-f
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
A cartoon by the American cartoonist Sidney Harris has one white-coated researcher saying to another: "Find out who set up this experiment. It seems that half of the patients were given a placebo and the other half were given a different placebo." In this week's BMJ we bring you that experiment.
On p 391 Ted Kaptchuk and colleagues report their randomised trial of two "placebo treatments." They wanted to see whether a sham acupuncture needle had a greater placebo effect than an inert pill in patients with persistent arm pain. The patients were randomised to a two week run-in period with either the sham device or a placebo pill. The patients were then re-randomised (those on sham acupuncture to continue the sham acupuncture or to real acupuncture and those on the placebo pill to continue the placebo or to amitriptyline). During the run-in period pain decreased about equally in both
Jane Smith, deputy editor
(jsmith@bmj.com)