Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;332:368 (11 February), doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7537.368
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The latest episode of Panoramaone of the most respected investigative current affairs programmes on UK televisiondelved into the key issues surrounding the recent decision to make trastuzumab (Herceptin) available free on the NHS for selected women with early breast cancer. As it unravelled, the story was of policy making determined at a raw socio-political level rather than on the more traditional clinical grounds.
On one side of the debate were enthusiasts arguing that trastuzumab was a "wonder" drug, and a "must have" medicine for the early treatment of women with an aggressive form of breast cancer in which the malignant cells are HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) positive. On the other were more wary prescribers who saw the drug as costly and of unproven value and one that still needed careful cost effectiveness and benefit/harm evaluations before the NHS could adopt it wholesale. The debate began
Joe Collier, professor of medicines policy
St George's, University of London jcollier@sgul.ac.uk