Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;332:278 (4 February), doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7536.278
Ed Peile, professor of medical education1
1 Division of Medical Education, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL ed.peile@warwick.ac.uk
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Much of today's learning happens in modules. Neatly packaging concepts into topic areas is convenient for course organisers and for those who accredit learning. Patients remind us daily that the real life problems of medicine defy such artificial boundaries. The problems that Mr Bond's team are dealing with involve both psyche and soma simultaneously.1 Thus, considerations of the pathophysiological mechanisms of disease, imaging and diagnostics, surgical interventions, and therapeutics must take place alongside ethical debate and psychological engagement, all within the pragmatic context of limited resources. That is the value of case-based learningit is real, complex, and convoluted. Mr Bond's case forces us to integrate our learning from different areas of medical studies and apply this to the dilemmas facing a real patient.
In the rapid responses on bmj.com, doctors and students showed how this is possible. Having rejected "covert moral judgment colouring decision-making," an eminent North American doctor
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?