Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;332:251-252 (4 February), doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7536.251
Australia has given up mandatory detention because it damages detainees' mental health
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
More than 7 million of the world's 17 million refugees remain "warehoused" under conditions of confinement,1 raising serious human rights issues about the treatment of people fleeing oppression. The British policy of expanding detention centres for asylum seekers adds to this concern, making it timely to consider what lessons might be learnt from Australia's recent reversal of its mandatory detention policy.
In 2002 Australia stood alone in introducing indefinite, non-reviewable, mandatory detention for asylum seekers arriving by boat or without valid entry documents. Asylum seekers of all ages, including children, were held for years in remote detention centres. From the outset, the medical profession (clinicians, researchers, the Australian Medical Association, and specialist colleges) raised concerns that detention might adversely affect the mental health of traumatised refugees.2 Clinical observations were supported by research conducted by an Iraqi doctor held in detention3 and by Australian specialists in refugee mental health.2 4 A
Mina Fazel, lecturer in child and adolescent psychiatry
Warneford Hospital, Oxford University, Oxford OX3 7JX
(mina.fazel@psych.ox.ac.uk)
Derrick Silove, director
Centre for Population Mental Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2170, Australia
Read all Rapid Responses