Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;332:244 (28 January), doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7535.244
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Recently we returned from the area in Pakistan affected by October's earthquake, having provided care to people suffering in its aftermath. Nothing could have prepared us for the distressing scenes we saw. Whole generations have been lost; millions of people have been left homeless and thousands of children orphaned.
| |||||||||||
As in all recent natural disasters there was an outpouring of charity from the public and a rush to the scene of scores of emergency relief organisations. These ranged from recognised, regulated official organisations to unregulated and ad hoc groups.
Many individual overseas medical professionals volunteered their help and inundated the afflicted areas. However, although well meant, their help led us to question whether volunteer doctors do more harm than good.
| We were alarmed at the number of |
Hasan Tahir, consultant physician and rheumatologist
Academic Rheumatology and Osteoporosis Unit, Whipps Cross University Hospital, London hasan.tahir@whippsx.nhs.uk
Zafar Iqbal, general practitioner and sports physician
Carlton House Surgery, Enfield
Read all Rapid Responses