Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;332:238 (28 January), doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7535.238-a
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EditorThe BMJ has highlighted the bureaucratic burden placed on health researchers by the research governance approval process.1 2 Our own study sought only to interview health professionals in 12 trusts about giving advice, with a few patient telephone interviews, but the process of seeking approval from one research and development consortium delayed our project by 11 weeks.
If this sort of approval process does not put researchers off, then the procedure for gaining honorary contracts surely will. These contracts are apparently a necessary requirement for everyone conducting research in the NHSeven NHS staff if they are collecting data from NHS trusts other than the one that employs them. Unbelievably, even when one of us already held an NHS honorary contract with one trust, another honorary contract had to be issued by the same trust (with accompanying delays) because the previous one was linked to a different project.
Many trusts also require
Niall Galbraith, research fellow
Division of Health in the Community, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL n.d.galbraith@warwick.ac.uk
Carol Hawley, principal research fellow, Valerie De-Souza, research fellow
Division of Health in the Community, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL
Read all Rapid Responses