Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;332:236 (28 January), doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7535.236-a
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EditorThe paper by McColl et al and the accompanying editorial raise important questions about the provision of primary care in areas with high levels of deprivation.1 2 It is misleading to focus on refugees and asylum seekers as it suggests that the only problem is one of discrimination against this groupalthough there may be some truth in this assertion, the reality is far more complex. Accessing primary care is a problem for all residents of Tower Hamlets and, by extrapolation, for those in other areas with similar populations.
This is nothing newsuch communities have always been comparatively underresourced. But what has changed is the clamour for increased quality of service provision and increased levels of access at the same time as there has been a shift of work from secondary to primary care. Primary care trusts, in contrast, find themselves in the unenviable position of having to cajole general practitioners into
James N Hardy, general practitioner principal
Bethnal Green Health Centre, London E2 6LL james.hardy@nhs.net